|
|
#21 | |
|
Grand Inquisitor
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Shizuoka, Japan
Posts: 493
|
Quote:
Probably I'm being a bit judgmental, but whatever -- it's not important. The main point I want to make is that for people whose job it is to market and sell games, classifications like 'hardcore gamer' and 'casual gamer' make sense and are useful. But people who just play games hear those terms being used, and we feel like they have to mean something to us. Why? It's daft. I guess it's that same desperate need for an identity that leads people to call themselves 'gamers' in the first place. And, you know, if someone wants to call himself a gamer, I can imagine him getting all serious about it and calling himself a 'hardcore gamer'. But who on earth would call themselves a 'casual gamer'? It doesn't make any sense. I think people who actually are 'casual gamers' wouldn't call themselves gamers, and probably don't know the term 'casual gamer' even exists. The long and short of it, I guess, is that the terms 'hardcore gamer' and 'casual gamer' mean different things to marketers than they do to, uh, gamers. Or rather, they mean something to marketers, and gamers aren't sure what they mean but boy howdy can they argue about it, 'cause that's what gamers do. "I AM A GAMER, THIS DISCUSSION ABOUT SOMETHING RELATED TO GAMING IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT TO ME, AND ALSO THE IGNORANT MASSES IF ONLY THEY KNEW IT!!" Sorry, being a bit of a wanker aren't I. I'm listening to Violator right now and it's probably affecting my brain. Like, see how I said "Violator" just then, instead of "Violator by Depeche Mode" -- like my attitude is that you should already know what Violator is, and if you don't I guess I'm just not addressing you? What a wanker. What a great album mind you. |
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Smug Bison
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 953
|
Quote:
In any case, even when they're utterly pointless, semantic debates can still be interesting - if only for what they reveal about the people involved. |
|
|
|
#23 | ||
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2
|
Quote:
I know for me a lot of the relevance and importance of defining gaming is because I can feel "special", superior and knowledgeable about a topic. When it comes to gaming I'm a fucking legend, you are a newb, scrub etc. I can look down on people the same way a wine wanker can look down on the unwashed horde. In real life I'm (hopefully) not quite derranged and unstable enough to actually believe that, but I get a good feeling from being a "hardcore" gamer. When I beat someone not just because of skill, but because I "know" the game better than them, it's a great feeling. I believe that gamers themselves are almost 100% responsible for the tag "casual" and "hardcore" - marketing drones picked these terms up to more readily identify with their audience. You are right when you say most "casual" gamers don't call themselves "casual" - but a "hardcore" gamer most certainly calls themselve "hardcore" and has no hesitation in labelling someone "casual". Quote:
PS Thank you for compliments on my name - we need a thread explaining where our handles come from and what makes them special. That way I can pour my heart out more and do less work while feeling good about myself! |
||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|